Why is it that we always have to settle for a lesser hero?
Why not have a peaceful and prosperous rule of Amarendra Bahubali and Devsena, both masters in warfare and administration, both groomed as a prince and a princess, both with a good heart & resourceful minds full of empathy, and both with strategic vision?
Why do people have to be content with Mahendra Bahubali, a hero who rises after 25 years, due to his sheer strength of arms, who first set foot out of his tiny village only to find his dream girl, and fighting only with raw spirit. Yes, he pulls that last minute trick, which until I saw Bahubali 2, I thought only Alex and Jessica could pull during their European circus days in Madagascar, but still, pardon my blunt statement, he is a lesser hero!
And that makes me question more ..
Why did Ned Stark not become the king of seven kingdoms, after the rebellion. In fact, why is it even called Robert's rebellion, when it all triggered due to a Stark girl and ended after a Stark boy killed a Targaryen prince - Why did people have to settle for Robert Baratheon instead in the first place?
Why did the first Matrix, which was 'designed to be perfect' fail? Why do the race of men need that anomaly of 'the One' whose ultimate job was to eradicate almost of all them each time he got created?
Why can't Batman, who never stops being right, be the White Knight - and it is instead Harvey Dent who becomes the White Knight? [although as soon as he gets the first personal hit, he turns two-faced]
For that matter, before league of justice was formed, why does Superman need to be hunted down by the good guy Batman, despite all the heroics that Superman did for our world?
Why do the Jim Gordons of the world need to admit that Batman is the hero that the world deserves but don't need right now, so we will hunt him?
And why do the Katappas of the world have to actually hunt them down?
Why-O-Why?
- parsooram
